The Coors Field Effect & the Jason Jennings Trade
*Update at end of article
This article comes in response to some of the best discussion and analysis of a trade that I've been a part of lately, (read the discussions, here and here). I've decided to dive into some stats in hopes of projecting Jason Jennings' 2007 performance as well as find out how much Coors Field actually does affect a pitcher's ERA.
First of all let me say that despite popular belief, the infamous humidor was actually installed at Coors Field in 2002. This apparatus received a lot of press last year due to the Colorado Rockies pitchers' amazing performance at home. However, as I said, the humidor has been in place since 2002. To be honest, I think the Rockies simply finally had a pitching staff that suited their stadium, not the other way around. Now that we've got that out of the way, let's get into some of the stats.
I've gathered a somewhat small list of pitchers who have pitched in Colorado and looked at their ERA before, during, and after their time spent with the Rockies. While the list is far from complete, it's the best I can do while still holding down my day job. I'd love to do this stuff for a living but we're not there yet. Without further ado, the pitchers and their stats...
Joe Kennedy - in 2003 with Tampa Bay he posted a 6.13 ERA. In 2004 with the Rockies, that dropped to 3.66. And oh, by the way, his ERA was 0.14 BETTER in Colorado than away from it. In 2005 Kennedy's ERA ballooned up above 7 with the Rockies. He was then dealt to Oakland where his ERA dropped to 4.45 after the A's converted him to a reliever. His career ERA now sits at 4.79.
Pedro Astacio - In 1997 Astacio went from the Los Angles Dodgers to the Colorado Rockies. His ERA with the Dodgers was 4.10 compared to his 4.25 ERA with the Rockies. Over the next 4 years Astacio's ERA with the Rockies averaged about 5.50. He then dropped his ERA to 3.14 when he went to Houston, however that was only over the course of 4 starts. The next year with the Mets, Astacio's ERA rebounded to 4.79, much closer to his career average of 4.67.
Daryl Kile - Kile had the best year of his career in 1997 with the Houston Astros. It should be noted however, that for the three seasons before '97, Kile's ERA averaged 4.57 with the Astros. In 1998, Kile went to Colorado and proceeded to put up ERA's of 5.20 and 6.61. In 2000, Kile went to the St. Louis Cardinals and resurrected his career averaging an ERA of 3.57 for two and a half years, before his life and career were tragically cut short by heart problems. His career ERA was 4.12.
Jose Mesa - In 2005 Jose Mesa put up a 4.77 ERA with the Pittsburgh Pirates. Last year with the Colorado Rockies, Mesa finished the year with a 3.86 ERA.
Kevin Ritz - From 1990 to 1992, Kevin Ritz had an average ERA of 9.46 with the Detroit Tigers. Ritz then went to Colorado and over his first three years there averaged an ERA of 5.03.
Mike Hampton
- In 1999, Mike Hampton had a career year for the Houston Astros. He
compiled an amazing 22-4 record with a 2.90 ERA. The year after,
Hampton had a 3.14 ERA with the New York Mets. Similarly to Kile,
Hampton then put up two horrible years with the Colorado Rockies.
Hamptons ERA's over 2001 and 2002 were 5.41 and 6.15 respectively.
Hampton then escaped Colorado, moving to the Atlanta Braves putting up
a much improved ERA of 3.84 and 4.28 over the next two years. It's
undeniable evidence that Coors Field kills pitchers right? Hampton gave
up career highs in home runs over those two years, so that has to be
Coors right? Not so fast. Hampton also had career lows in strike outs
per 9 innings as well as walks per 9 innings pitched.
AND, the clincher is that Hampton's ERA was actually 0.76 WORSE away from home in 2002 (his 6.15 ERA year). Even more astonishing is the fact that 12 of Hampton's 15 losses that year came away from home. By those numbers, Coors Field actually HELPED Hampton's ERA.
So, what have we learned? Well, Daryl Kile and Mike Hampton sure seemed to suffer from pitching in the thin air of Coors Field. However, as we saw with Hampton, you can't attribute their inflated ERA's merely to where they pitched. Mike Hampton would have had a horrible year in 2002 if he had pitched at sea level. To top it off, I have the stats to back that statement up! As we just saw, Hampton's ERA was three quarters of a run better at home than when pitching away from Coors Field. So, let's go back and take a look at the pitcher who inspired this whole article, Jason Jennings.
Jennings is coming off a career year in terms of ERA. His 3.78 ERA was nearly a run better than his career average. So, will leaving Coors behind for the spacious center field of Minute Maid Park help Jennings' stats? Before you answer take a look at Jennings' stats over the last three years. His ERA has averaged 4.71 but is nearly half a run (0.43) better away from Coors Field. But wait, his ERA was only 3.78 last year, if he drops half a run off that he'd have a very good 3.25 next year for the Astros. Well, if you only look at last year's stats, I've got some bad news for you. Jennings' ERA was actually nearly half a run (0.41) worse away from home.
So, where does all that leave us (besides probably half asleep)? We've learned that you can't simply subtract a run or more from a pitcher's ERA just because he pitches half his games at Coors Field. In fact, several pitchers, including Mike Hampton, performed BETTER at Coors field than away from it. Last year, the Houston Astros' newest pitcher, Jason Jennings, fell into that category. So, using last years numbers, his ERA for Houston should be around 4.00. If you look at Jennings' stats for the previous three years, his ERA will be about half a run better away from Coors but that is only good for an ERA of about 4.25. So, looking at those numbers I'll let you decide whether you'd want Jennings as your team's #2 pitcher.
Update: I just found Kile's split stats for his two seasons with the Rockies. His ERA was nearly 1.5 and 2.0 runs better AWAY from Coors than in it for his two season with the Rockies. It would certainly appear that Coors field had a negative impact on his ERA. However, Kile appears to be the only pitcher who's stats support the idea that Jennings will be a drastically better pitcher away from Colorado. I'm still digging into the stats but I'll post more when I have it.

Come on man.. pay attention to your research... Kevin Ritz didn't have a 9.46 ERA in Detroit from 90-92... You screwed up your calculations. Ritz only pitched 22.2 innings in 90-91 and you averaged his ERA from those years straight up with the 5.6 ERA he put up in 92 when he pitched 80.1 innings. If you take his 4 years in Detroit, his actual ERA is only 5.87. His ERA went down to a 5.20 in Colorado which could be attributed to switching from the American league with the DH to the National league.
www.crawfishboxes.com
Report any abuse or spam
Concerning CO pitchers having higher ERA's away from Coors field...
"It's going to be a different ballpark, not so much the dimensions, [but] as far as the grip and the action on my ball that will be the biggest difference," Jennings said. "Because the thin air in Denver definitely makes a difference when it comes to getting a grip on all your pitches, which is a big deal for me, and also the movement on your pitches.
If your pitches react differently than you are accustomed to, it would seem you would probably have a higher ERA.
We'll see how things pan out this season. But the best two examples are Kile and Hampton who both were exceptionally better in season they didn't pitch in CO.
Report any abuse or spam
Thomas, you're right, I just averaged out the years ERA's not innings. Didn't have all day to work on the number.
Of course Jennings is going to say that pitching in Colorado is going affect his stuff. The problem is, he pitched worse last year AWAY from Colorado. So, maybe the air does affect things, but apparently pitchers are able to adjust.
As for Kile and Hampton, I showed you that Hampton pitched better in Colorado than away from it as well in 2002.
Also, moving from the AL to DH likely would lower your ERA but you'd be tough pressed to argue that pitching in Colorado hurt Ritz.
I'm currently looking for Kile's split stats to see how well he did home and away while with the Rockies.
Also, if Coors Field inflates stats so much, how do you explain their pitchers performances there last year?
Report any abuse or spam
Thomas I was going to point out the same thing--what Jennings said.
Rumor: I'll post the link on my blog for it.
My belief is that Jennings probably was able to make a great adjustment to Coors because he had been there so long. However, that might have affected him on the road--along with the fact that, being part of a really bad team, you tend to sink down to the level of teammates.
Report any abuse or spam
I think you are looking at this wrong Rumor. I understand the motivation to break down home and away numbers and look at it on a micro level, but I think this is one of the areas in baseball that calls for a more macro perspective.
No doubt pitching is Coors in different than pitching in other places. I think the humidor evens it out somewhat, especially as the adjust the settings on the humidor to find the right balance, but there still remains a difference. So the question is why do some pitchers succeed and other fail? I tend to agree with you that the Rockies finally had a pitching staff that suited their stadium. Whether they naturally were the right type of pitchers for the park or if they made adjustments, as Rita suggested, I don't know.
Where you get into trouble, however, is when you break down home and away stats for a pitcher in a given year. I think pitching is undoubtedly a mental exercise. Success is also the function of a large number of minor adjustments. I think when pitchers come to the Rockies that are not suited for Coors and they get beat up, it affects them mentally. The pitcher becomes more timid and makes a number minor adjustments to improve his chances. A pitcher cannot just turn these adjustments and this mindset off when he leaves Coors.
For some pitchers, like Kile, the adjustments and mental state that he moves towards are still more successful outside of Coors than in it. For others, like Hampton, the adjustments and his mental conditions are less successful outside Colorado.
The point is, pitching in Coors has an affect on the pitcher for the entire season. That effect is reflected in his stats for the entire year, not matter the ballpark. You cannot assume that the pitcher's away stats would have been the same if he had not been on the Rockies that season. His away numbers are already tainted by the Coors effect and the adjustments he had to make.
Report any abuse or spam
We will have to revisit this subject around the All Star Break--This has become a really intriguing discussion and at least part of the tale will be told by Jennings' numbers by then.
Report any abuse or spam